Submit a Proposal
CNICS has evolved to become a fully mature platform that can support translational, clinical, and behavioral research projects from any investigator who desires to use the platform as part of their funded research projects or as part of a pilot project to gain further research support. We believe that the active recruitment of investigators to use the CNICS platform for basic, translational, clinical, and socio-behavioral research, and the fact that investigators inside and outside of CNICS can submit proposals for extramural funding (R21s, R01s, Program Projects, or in response to RFAs and RFPs), establishes CNICS as a flexible resource that can support cutting-edge HIV science over the next decade and beyond.
For more information and guidelines on how to access CNICS data, specimens or Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs), review the instructions provided in the tables below. Links to required forms are provided. Frequently Asked Questions about CNICS can be found in the FAQs.
|Determining Study Feasibility
For studies requesting data from the cohort dataset, a Study Feasibility Form may be submitted. You will receive aggregate data to determine if sufficient numbers of patients qualify for your study. No actual clinical data will be transmitted. Formal review of data requests by the Research Coordinating Committee (RCC) is required before patient data or PROs are shared for study. Study feasibility cannot be determined for requests concerning data that is not currently available in the cohort dataset. Such requests require evaluation by the RCC using the formal review process. Inclusion of a member of the CNICS leadership to the study team is required before formal review of any concept study.
If you would like to request or check availability of specimens only, submit a Specimen Feasibility Request Form. Requests for CNICS specimens do not require formal review by the Research Coordinating Committee. Requests for specimens linked to data require formal review by the RCC.
|Types of Requests Submitted to CNICS
Formal requests for projects utilizing CNICS data in the cohort dataset is initiated by submission of a Concept Proposal Application. The application contains instructions for electronic submission to the CNICS Operations Center. Details of the formal review process are found below and in the CNICS Concept SOP.
Requests for data which is not currently available in the CNICS dataset from patient records may be obtained through CNICS under certain circumstances. Costs and additional time will be required for such requests and receipt of such data from some or all CNICS sites is not guaranteed. Study leaders will be expected to submit a draft Case Report Form with the Concept Proposal Application prior to review by the RCC. The following information must be included in requests for additional data:
|Details of the Research Coordinating Committee (RCC) Formal Review Process
Concept proposal applications for formal review are accepted year around. Applications require inclusion of a CNICS investigator from one of the CNICS sites. This collaborator will facilitate the review process to avoid overlap with existing proposals, refine study questions and address questions of feasibility. Contact CNICS if you need assistance identifying a collaborator. A member of the CNICS leadership must review all concept proposals prior to submission for RCC review. A date for this review must be provided in the CP application as evidence of the contribution of the leadership member toward the development of the study.
Concept proposal applications are reviewed on a conference call of the RCC on the 2nd Friday of each month at 12:30pm PT/2:30pm CT/3:30pm ET. Reviews last approximately 30 minutes. Additional dates/times for reviews may be requested under special circumstances.
PIs will receive written reviews from two thought leaders in the field to be discussed on the conference call. Review by the CNICS Epidemiology and Biostatistics team is also included. A priority score and final discussion points will be emailed to the investigator within two weeks after the RCC review call. In some instances, revisions may be required before a study is approved for implementation. Official letters of support may be requested for grant submissions based on approved CNICS concept studies within 7-10 days of submission deadlines.
|Determining if a CNICS Study Idea is Unique
Review the complete list of Ongoing Projects to avoid the submission of overlapping studies
|Next Steps After the RCC Formal Review is Completed
For all data, specimen and PRO requests, a Data Request Form is required from the study team before the transfer of any data from the CNICS Data Management Core. There are no costs associated with the transfer of the data; investigators are required to pay for costs associated with the shipment of specimens. Submission of the completed Data Request Form will initiate a Site Participation Survey by the Administrative Core. The Site Participation Survey is necessary to determine which sites will participate in a given study and to provide a unique contact person at participating sites. This contact or designees will represent participating sites on writing teams related to the study.
Local IRB review and approval must be provided to the CNICS Administrative Director or Operations Center before data transfers are initiated.
|Terms and Conditions for Use of CNICS Data or Specimens
A CNICS progress report form will be provided to the Research Coordinating Committee (RCC) at yearly intervals upon request from the Administrative Director/Operations Center. This generally occurs in January or February prior to the CNICS Annual Meeting (March). Any findings to be published (manuscripts, abstracts) as a result of a CNICS study must be reviewed by the study site participants. Investigators will receive a listing of all site participants prior to initiation of a study.
|Project Approval Rate
CNICS strives to approve concept proposals whenever possible for implementation in the full cohort or depending on the data needs, with as many sites participating as possible. In most instances, if studies are not approved upon initial review, investigators receive specific, detailed instructions for revisions. Revised studies are then reviewed by email to expedite the review process. Decisions by the RCC may be appealed as described in section 3.4.4 in the Concept Proposal SOP
Contact us regarding questions about the application process, including requests to identify a CNICS collaborator or assistance with developing an idea.