EC 490 exam preparation

 

1.    You'll find three extended problems. All give you a situation, instruct you to model specific aspects of it, and then ask you to solve for various equilibrium values of things.

 

2.    Two problems concern zero-sum games with no NE in pure strategies. The first problem mainly revolves around seeing how to set the game up; once you sort that out it's simpler than the rock-paper-scissors cases from the April problem set. The second is a standard type of problem involving 2 players with 3 strategies each. Payoffs involve uncertainty (i.e., values between 0 and 1).

 

3.    The third problem tests your understanding of signaling and screening. Be sure that you fully understand the logic of the labor market examples from the lecture, and the defender / attacker game from later in that lecture. The question has an easier first part (4 questions) and a more demanding second part (3 questions). Exercises 5, 6 and 7 from pp. 297 – 298 of the textbook are excellent preparation for the second part. Exercises 6 and 7 are harder than the exam problem, so if you master them your brain will be trained up at least well enough. I've set the second part of this problem in such a way that you don't have to do any calculations using Bayes's rule; you'll be able to duplicate what the professional does using Bayes's rule by trial and error with a few numbers.

 

  1. The key trick in this exam is thinking slowly, methodically and carefully. You have plenty of time. Don't rush. Think about the structures of the problems before you plunge in. Remember that I'm looking for reasons to award you marks, not reasons to deduct marks, so help me out in this by making everything you do clear and explicit. On the exam paper I've printed the following advice: "Go slowly and methodically. You earn marks by thinking carefully and showing that you're doing so. Make your thought transparent and organized-looking to me. That is, separate lines of work clearly and tell me what you're doing (as if I'm an idiot) unless it's utterly obvious. Print in large, neat, clear characters. It's not in your strategic interest to give rise to an irritated professor while I'm marking your work – signal your consideration for my utility and you'll thereby screen for my natural kindliness when I'm exercising discretion within the marking scheme."