Appendix CReview of Recommendations for Termination for Cause of a Faculty Member Due to a Bona Fide Financial Exigency, a Bona Fide Financial Crisis, or Academic Program/Unit Closure
Note: For purposes of this appendix, the terms “parties” or “party” refer to persons directly involved in the termination or hearing, normally the faculty member and the administration.I. Initiation of ProceedingsFormal proceedings for termination of a tenured faculty member due to a bona fide financial exigency, a bona fide financial crisis, or an academic program/unit closure, as defined in this Faculty Handbook and Policies, are initiated by the Provost’s sending to the faculty member, by certified mail, a letter containing a statement that the faculty member's appointment will be terminated due to one of these three causes. Tenured faculty appointments may be terminated with one year’s notice. Non-tenured faculty appointments may be terminated prior to the end of a previously agreed-upon period of appointment with one year’s notice or with the notice required for non-reappointment as defined this Faculty Handbook and Policies, whichever is less. Although the faculty member may wish to appeal the termination as a “grievance,” once the Provost has decided to terminate, the termination proceeding shall supercede, and shall make void, any grievance hearing on the same issue. The letter from the Provost to the faculty member being terminated shall include the following information:
A tenured faculty member proposed for termination must respond in writing to the Provost within thirty calendar days after receipt of the certified letter of Intent to Terminate from the Provost indicating whether the faculty member wishes to have a Hearing Committee review the decision. The response shall include (1) evidence indicating that the termination proposed in response to the bona fide financial exigency, bona fide financial crisis, or academic program/unit closure is not in keeping with the intent of the Faculty Handbook and Policies and (2) the names of witnesses who may be called on behalf of the faculty member to testify at a hearing, along with a brief statement of the nature and relevance of their testimony.
III. The Hearing CommitteeThe initial roster for the Hearing Committee shall be appointed by the Provost within thirty days of the faculty member’s request for a hearing. The initial roster shall consist of the next seven faculty members of the UAB-wide Grievance and Termination Hearing Panel who do not hold primary appointments in the department, school, or library of primary appointment of the faculty member being recommended for termination.Faculty members who are asked to serve on a Hearing Committee must recuse themselves if they believe that they cannot, for any reasons, fairly and impartially consider the facts of the case to be heard. The Provost may strike or excuse any individual who has a demonstrable conflict of interest or bias. Within seven days of receiving the list of committee members, the faculty member affected must request the removal of two members from a final group of seven (without having to show cause) so that the final Hearing Committee consists of the remaining five members. Individuals who are recused, excused, or struck will be replaced by the next in line on the roster. The final Hearing Committee will consist of five faculty members. If the five-member Hearing Committee is unable to carry out its duties in a timely fashion, the Provost must impanel another committee as specified above. The five-member Hearing Committee shall elect its own chair. Deans and department chairs will be expected to ensure that Hearing Committee members from their units are allowed sufficient time to participate in the hearing process. The Provost shall designate a faculty member to serve as a non-voting facilitator to the committee. The Hearing Committee shall be responsible for the conduct of the hearing and shall establish and enforce procedures to be used at the hearing.
While the administration must demonstrate the need for the proposed termination, the existence of the bona fide financial exigency, bona fide financial crisis, or academic program/unit closure shall not be open to review. The Hearing Committee shall consider all evidence presented and the testimony of witnesses that are called and shall, if deemed necessary, request further information from either party or additional witnesses
The Hearing Committee may hold pre-hearing meetings with or without the party(ies) present to (1) simplify the issues; (2) determine the rules of procedure and evidence to be used; (3) provide for the exchange and review of documentary or other information; (4) determine the witnesses to be called; and (5) achieve such other appropriate pre-hearing objectives as will make the hearing fair, effective, and expeditious. Both sides must provide the committee with any evidence that is requested and available.
The Hearing Committee hearing shall be governed by the following rules and regulations:
V. Committee Decision
After the hearing is concluded, the Hearing Committee shall meet to reach a decision. Within thirty calendar days after the hearing is concluded, the Hearing Committee must report in writing to the Provost whether or not termination of the faculty member is reasonable and is necessitated by a bona fide Financial exigency, a bona fide financial crisis, or an academic program/unit closure and whether proper procedure was followed as described in the Faculty Handbook and Policies. Within fifteen working days of receiving the Hearing Committee’s report, the Provost must forward to the President the committee’s recommendation along with the committee’s report. This report shall remain confidential, except as required by law.
VII. President’s Decision
The President may consider the Provost’s recommendation, evidence that was presented during the hearing, and the recommendation of the committee. The President must notify the faculty member, with copies to the Provost and the members of the Hearing Committee, of his/her decision within fifteen working days of receiving the committee’s report and recommendation as forwarded by the Provost. If the President does not implement the recommendations of the Hearing Committee, the reasons for not doing so must be included in the letter of notification. The decision of the President is final.