- "Jami is wonderful and I recommend her to everyone I encounter at UAB that expresses a need for career guidance. With her help and suggestions, my CV looks much more professional and I'm actually happy with it!"
- "Rowland is knowledgeable, has real life experience, and has my best interests at heart. I trust him. He does excellent work, and I'm grateful for the valuable input he offers."
- "Joy Jones was a tremendous aid in preparing me for my scholarship interview. She not only asked me questions, but helped me work through solid answers to give. She asked the tough questions, but I did not lose confidence because of her assistance and support throughout our meeting. I will certainly schedule an appointment with her again."
- "The staff members are very polite, professional, and competent in their area of expertise. I often recommend them to my classmates who need assistance with resumes, interviews, etc."
- "I am very grateful to the internship coordinator, Mr Yancey, for his continuous support in searching, starting and finishing my internship. He has been extremely helpful in each step."
- "Thank you so much for your help - you guys are awesome."
- "Not only helpful but a very personable, caring individual."
- "I am a biomedical postdoctoral fellow trying to transition into a non-research career. When I scheduled my appointment with Jami I knew the types of science positions I was interested in pursuing, but not how to identify job opportunities within those areas or how to target my CV and cover letter for specific careers. Jami was able to provide me with application information on my jobs of interest and helped me devise a career strategy, that has greatly motivated and energized me. I am excited to work with Jami more in the future."
- "Very useful, helpful, and firendly."
- "Melissa was honest and very helpful. I left the meeting feeling very prepared for my upcoming interview."
- "Ms. Trammell gave me very positive feedback on my resume and interview skills. I really appreciated her feedback and time in helping me to foster my professional skills."
A new multisite study shows that two approved generic medications for epilepsy had no detectable difference in clinical effects when compared to their brand name counterpart. The findings were published this week in an advance online edition ofthe Lancet Neurology.
The study, led by investigators at the University of Cincinnati, looked at two generics for the drug lamotrigine, a prescription antiepileptic medication. The University of Alabama at Birmingham was one of eight institutions involved in the study, which showed that, as long as patients adhere to treatment, the two generics did not show any difference in their bioequivalence.
“Consequently, it should give increased confidence to both clinicians and patients that existing regulations are providing generic drugs that can be safely substituted, even in cases where medicine is lifesaving,” said Michael Privitera, M.D., professor in the Department of Neurology, director of the Epilepsy Center at the University of Cincinnati Neuroscience Institute and the study’s lead author. “Patients can now feel safe about substituting generics (of their antiepileptic drug) without concerns of interactions or undesired effects.”
The study included 35 adult patients with epilepsy who currently take lamotrigine, and looked at long-term dosing using two currently on-market epileptic generic drugs. The researchers took measures to ensure treatment adherence, a factor that can affect long-term trials. This trial used patient diaries, electronic medication monitoring and tablet counts to keep adherence to nearly 100 percent. The study found that patients on generics had no increase in seizure risk, nor an increase in side effects.
|“There is now increasing evidence that there is no significant difference between generic medications and brand name medications for most conditions.”|
“This study should change how the medical community and patients view generic medications,” said Jerzy Szaflarski, M.D., Ph.D., professor in the Department of Neurology at UAB and director of the UAB Epilepsy Center in the School of Medicine. “There is now increasing evidence that there is no significant difference between generic medications and brand name medications for most conditions.”
The need for effective generics is essential to some patients who need daily medication to treat serious conditions like epilepsy. The FDA estimates $230 billion per year is saved by generic substitutions.
Along with the University of Cincinnati and UAB, the study’s co-authors included researchers from Drake University, University of Madison-Wisconsin, University of Kansas Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, University of Pennsylvania, the office of research for the Food and Drug Administration, and the University of Rochester.
This study was funded by the American Epilepsy Society, Epilepsy Foundation, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Privitera is president of the American Epilepsy Society. He does not cite any conflicts of interest.