-
Step into the role of an NIH study section member and experience what happens after a grant is submitted. Through a facilitated simulation, participants will read, critique and score an actual grant (K or R application) and will see how their comments influence the discussion. Participants are able to learn how a study section operates from the other side of the process, to better prepare their own grants for review. Nothing can replace hands-on experience with grant reviews. Thus, participants will be required to read and score grants as if they were a reviewer.
Schedule (All offerings will be held via Zoom): Registration
Sept. 19 at noon: Lisa Jackson (K23)
Sept. 22 at noon: Will Geisler (K23)
Sept. 28: CCTS Translational Training Symposium David Pollock (R01) -
NIH Reviewer Orientation (pdf)
Review Criteria at a Glance – Master (pdf)
Scoring System and Procedure (pdf)
Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects Section (pdf)
NIH Peer Review Webinars and Videos
Sample Applications and Summary Statements
Overall Impact vs. Significance (pdf)
Roles and Responsibilities of a CCTS Mock Study Section Member (docx)
-
For more information about the Mock NIH Study Section, contact:
Jean LambertThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. -
September 12 – R01 Review:
David Pollock, PhD
Professor
Dept. of Medicine
UAB Heersink School of MedicineSeptember 14 - R01 Review:
Martin Young, PhD
Professor
Dept. of Medicine
UAB Heersink School of MedicineSeptember 19 – K23 Review:
Lisa Jackson, MD
Interim Director
UAB Division of Cardiovascular DiseaseSeptember 22 – K23 Review:
Will Geisler, MD, MPH
Professor
Dept. of Medicine
Associate Dean, UAB Physician Science Development Office